one stop esop blog

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

We're Here to Help

describe the image

Aaron Juckett 
President 
CPA, CPC, QPA, QKA 
ESOP Partners LLC 
Phone: 920-659-6000 
Toll Free: 800-837-3112 
Direct: 920-659-6002 
Fax: 866-337-1095 
AJuckett@ESOPPartners.com
ESOPPartners.com 
OneStopESOPBlog.com 

2013 IRS Pension Plan Limits

401(k) Deferral Limit - $17,500

Annual Additions Limit - $51,000

Maximum Compensation Limit - $255,000

Catch-Up Contribution Limit - $5,500

Highly Compensated Employee - $115,000

ESOP 5-Year Distribution Threshold - $1,035,000

ESOP Additional Year Threshold - $205,000

2012 Pension Plan Limits

1989 - 2012 Plan Limits

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

AICPA Submits Comments on Proposed DOL Regulations

The AICPA Forensic and Valuation Services Executive Committee (FVSEC), on behalf of the AICPA, has submitted comments on the proposed DOL regulations to define ESOP appraisers as fiduciaries. The comments highlight their concerns with the proposed rule and discuss the potential effect of the proposed regulations:

ESCA Submits Comments on Proposed DOL Regulations

The Employee-Owned S Corporations of America (ESCA) has submitted their formal comments on the proposed DOL regulations to define ESOP appraisers as fiduciaries, expressing concern about how the regulations would reduce the number of qualified ESOP appraisers and significantly increase the cost:

ESCA, however, is concerned that the Proposed Regulation, which expands the definition of investment advice to include a valuation of closely-held employer securities that an ESOP is required to obtain at least annually, would have the perverse effect of limiting the number of qualified appraisers available to give such valuations and would significantly increase the costs of this necessary service.
If the Proposed Regulation is finalized as drafted, ESCA is concerned that many of the established and well-respected appraisal firms will choose to discontinue their ESOP appraisal business rather than face the additional insurance costs and legal exposure that the Proposed Regulation would impose. For many of the best, top-tier firms that conduct appraisals, we understand that ESOP valuations are not a major component of the firm's client portfolio. Taking these professionals out of the market would increase the use of smaller, less-experienced appraisers, who may not provide superior service and expertise to ESOP companies.
As previously noted, the Proposed Regulation would also expose ESOP appraisers to a major expansion of their legal liability. This exposure can only be mitigated by substantially broader insurance protection, which inevitably means a major increase in insurance premiums. These costs will impose additional transactional costs that will inevitably be passed on to employee-owned S corporations and their employees.

If you work for an ESOP company or are an ESOP professional, please make sure to submit your comments by the February 3 deadline. Here is more information on submitting comments:

To facilitate the receipt and processing of comment letters, the EBSA encourages interested persons to submit their comments electronically by e-mail to e-ORI@dol.gov, subject line: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule
or by using the Federal eRulemaking portal at http://www.regulations.gov. Persons submitting comments electronically are encouraged not to submit paper copies. Persons interested in submitting paper copies should send or deliver their comments to the Office of Regulations and Interpretations, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Attn: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule, Room N-5655, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. All comments will be available to the public, without charge, online at http://www.regulations.gov and http://www.dol.gov/ebsa and at the Public Disclosure Room, N-1513, Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Warning: Do not include any personally identifiable information (such as name, address, or other contact information) or confidential business information that you do not want publicly disclosed. All comments may be posted on the Internet and can be retrieved by most Internet search engines. Comments may be submitted anonymously.

The ESOP Association Submits Tax Reform Comments

The ESOP Association has submitted comments to the House Ways and Means Committee hearing on fundamental tax reform. The comments note suggest that the Committee should use the 1986 Tax Reform process as their model:

Latest Estimate of Potential ESOP Universe

Over the years we have shared estimates of the Number of Baby Boomers, Baby Boomer Business Owners, and the Potential ESOP Universe. Last year the NCEO suggested the number was around 400,000. Trends in Employee Ownership: Important Demographic Developments explores some of the trends, citing 150,000 to 300,000 business that may be well-suited for an ESOP in the next few years:

That's why fundamental demographic trends are so significant. The best estimates are that there are 78 million baby boomers in the U.S. (people born between 1946 and 1964)...These individuals, well along in life and career, have amassed over $13 trillion in assets — about 50 percent of the total held by all Americans. And a good portion of those assets takes the form of privately held businesses. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there are approximately 6 million businesses with employees. More than half of these businesses are owned by boomers — who will want to unload those firms as they retire.

The Importance of Trust

Part 3 - Building a System of Trust: Ten Hidden Secrets of Success in Employee-Owned Companies is now online. It shares three more hidden secrets and summarizes the importance of trust: "Simply put: without trust, the performance potential of an employee-owned company is severely diminished because the capacity to create competitive advantage through collaborative innovation is never realized."

Brown v. Medtronic Inc., No. 09-2524 (8th Cir., Dec. 13, 2010)

The January 14, 2011 Employee Ownership Update is online and discusses the following:

2010 and 2011 Qualified Charitable Distributions Rules

If you have a participant that missed their 2010 Required Minimum Distributions deadline, the IRS has provided another opportunity for the participant to satisfy their 2010 RMD requirements. Retirement News for Employers – January 12, 2011 Special Edition discusses how the qualified charitable distribution (QCD) provisions were renewed for 2010 and 2011 and how the deadline to make a 2010 QCD is January 31, 2011. A QCD allows an individual age 70½ and older to exclude from income an amount paid directly from an IRA trust to a qualified charity and will satisfy the Required Minimum Distributions requirements. It also suggests a remedy if the the IRA owner has already taken their 2010 RMD:

The qualified charitable distribution provisions were renewed for 2010 and 2011, allowing individuals age 70½ or over to exclude from gross income up to $100,000 that is paid directly from their individual retirement accounts (excluding SEP or SIMPLE IRAs) to a qualified charity. The excluded amount can be used to satisfy any required minimum distributions that the individual must otherwise receive from their IRAs for 2010 and 2011. The deadline for making a 2010 QCD is January 31, 2011. The election to treat a January 2011 QCD as having been made in 2010 is made by including the QCD on the individual's 2010 income tax return.

5 Employee Committees

5 Workplace Committees to Form and Their Business Benefits shares five employee committees to consider, including an ESOP education committee:

McCabe v. Capital Mercury Apparel, 2010 WL 4507443 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

In McCabe v. Capital Mercury Apparel, 2010 WL 4507443 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) a federal trial court ruled that a plan sponsor did not breach its Duties of an ERISA Fiduciary Responsiblities when it paid participants in June 2009 using a June 30, 2008 valuation for participants with account values less than $1,000. [See Distribution Timing: Mandatory Distributions for more information on the force out distribution rules.]

Court Upholds ESOP's Use of Year-Old Valuation to Process Distributions reviews the court's findings, including the fact that the correct valuation was used and that the cost to obtain a new Interim Valuation would run counter to The Exclusive Benefit Rule that provides that an ERISA fiduciary must act solely in the interest of the plan's participants and beneficiaries while defraying reasonable plan expenses:

The court found, however, that so long as defendants used the June 30, 2008 valuation for the distribution because it reasonably appeared to maximize returns for Plan participants under then-prevailing circumstances, they were justified in doing so. The court also concluded that there "can be no question that reliance on the June 30, 2008 valuation seemed to best serve Participant interests." A new valuation was expected to cost at least $20,000 — practically a third of the plan sponsor's total value at the time. The court asserted that incurring over $20,000 in expenses for a new valuation, only a short time before the regularly scheduled valuation was set to take place, would run counter to defendants' statutory duty to defray administrative expenses. Accordingly, the court held that the plan sponsor acted in manner consistent with its fiduciary duty of loyalty by using the June 30, 2008 valuation as the basis for the distribution.

DOL Public Hearing

The January 3, 2011 Employee Ownership Update is online and discusses the following:

2010 Benefit Payment Government Filings (IRS Forms 1099-R, 1096, 945)

If you paid any benefit payments last year you will have to prepare and file some government forms. The General Instructions for Forms 1099, 1098, 5498, and W-2G provides guidance on how to prepare and file the forms:

The 112th United States Congress

It seems like yesterday that we announced the first session of The 111th United States Congress. Last week we recapped the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010, one of their final actions.

Today marks the first day of the 112th United States Congress. With the new session comes new committees and new legislation. Although the ESOP legislation of the 111th U.S. Congress is no longer active, we have archived it on the left sidebar for your reference. It will take the advocacy of the ESOP community to ensure that the 112th U.S. Congress introduces and ultimately enacts similar or more favorable ESOP legislation. You can continue to stay current on ESOP legislation by following our blog.
All Posts