one stop esop blog

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

We're Here to Help

describe the image

Aaron Juckett 
President 
CPA, CPC, QPA, QKA 
ESOP Partners LLC 
Phone: 920-659-6000 
Toll Free: 800-837-3112 
Direct: 920-659-6002 
Fax: 866-337-1095 
AJuckett@ESOPPartners.com
ESOPPartners.com 
OneStopESOPBlog.com 

2013 IRS Pension Plan Limits

401(k) Deferral Limit - $17,500

Annual Additions Limit - $51,000

Maximum Compensation Limit - $255,000

Catch-Up Contribution Limit - $5,500

Highly Compensated Employee - $115,000

ESOP 5-Year Distribution Threshold - $1,035,000

ESOP Additional Year Threshold - $205,000

2012 Pension Plan Limits

1989 - 2012 Plan Limits

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

ESOP Planning 2008: Distributions (1 of 4)

Distribution planning is one of the most important components of the planning process. Even if you had a detailed plan in place when you established your plan, chances are that things have changed. You should perform a distribution analysis annually. Here are some things to consider:

Revisiting the LaRue Takeaways

I am sure everyone remembers the discussions following the LaRue ruling in February. Just in case you missed it, let's take some time to review some of the recommended takeaways and best practices:

  • Documentation and Due Diligence – Ensure best practices of documentation and due diligence are taking place for all fiduciary decisions to demonstrate that decisions are being made with the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to participants and their beneficiaries and defraying reasonable expenses of administering the plan.

    • Plan Expenses – Review the Plan Expenses to ensure that fees charged by service providers, attorneys, valuation firms, etc. are reasonable.

    • Service Agreements – Review service agreements to ensure the allocation of liability and indemnification rights between the plan sponsor and service providers is clear.

  • Compliance with ERISA Section 404(c) – Review Plan Documents and Disclosures, administration policies and procedures, and quality control processes to ensure full compliance with ERISA Section 404(c).

    • Administrative Policies and Procedures – Make sure that the possibility of administrative errors is minimized and that participant directions are promptly processed and implemented. Make changes to the plan document, SPD, and administrative forms and processes as needed.

    • Investment Policies and Procedures – Review investment policies and procedures to make sure that the investment options are prudent. Consider providing access to investment advisors when appropriate.

  • Claims Procedures – Treat challenges to plan administration and investment errors as claims for benefits under the plan. Denial of benefit claims under ERISA Section 502(a)(1)(B) require the participant to first exhaust administrative remedies and give the plan the opportunity to review the claim and either grant the claim or potentially put the plan in a better position to defend itself if the claim is denied and later litigated.

  • Fiduciary Liability Insurance and Training – Make sure you have adequate Fiduciary Liability Insurance for all plan fiduciaries and that the coverage is non-wasting. Provide training to fiduciaries on an ongoing basis about their fiduciary exposure and ways to minimize their risk.

For more information on the case itself, check out the LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Assoc. Inc., No. 06-856 (Feb. 20, 2008) information page and related links.

ESOP Planning 2008: Plan Expenses

Most 401(k) plan sponsors have become accustomed to performing a due diligence review of plan expenses every one to five years. This review is done primarily because ERISA provides that qualified retirement plans are solely for the benefit of the participants and that plan expenses must be reasonable. The review also helps ensure that fees as well as the supplementary tools provided are competitive with the marketplace.

In re Ford Motor Co. ERISA Litigation, No. 06-11718

Federal Judge Allows Ford ESOP Suit to Move Forward discusses how In re Ford Motor Co. ERISA Litigation, No. 06-11718 (E.D. Mich. December 22, 2008) modified In re Ford Motor Co. ERISA Litigation, No. 06-11718 (E.D. Mich. March 31, 2008) and denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case on grounds that they committed no fiduciary breach under ERISA because the plan is required to be invested in company stock:

However, U.S. District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III noted in his opinion that while ERISA does provide an exemption from diversification rules for ESOPs, it does so while still requiring that the plan sponsor act with prudence when investing in company stock.

Heroes Earnings Assistance and Relief Tax Act of 2008 (HEART Act)

Last week we discussed the importance of making sure your plan been amended for changes in legislation in ESOP Planning 2008: Plan Documents and Disclosures. One of the major pieces of Employee Benefits Legislation enacted in 2008 is the HEART Act. Some of the changes were retroactive to 2007 and others are effective January 1, 2009, so you will need to make sure you are complying with the new regulations, determine if any retroactive adjustments need to be made, and ensure that the rules are properly applied going forward. An amendment must be adopted by the end of the 2010 plan year.

Fiduciary Liability Insurance

We noted in our recent ERISA Fidelity Bonding discussion that fiduciary liability insurance does not satisfy the fidelity bonding requirements. This was reiterated in Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2008-04 – EBSA issues guidance on fidelity bonding for employee benefit plans. FIDUCIARY LIABILITY INSURANCE: A Risk Management Tool for Fiduciaries in a New Retirement Plan Environment discusses what fiduciary liability insurance provides:

Tags: 

H.R. 7327: Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008 (WRERA) / Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs)

The Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008 (WRERA)

ESOP Planning 2008: Plan Documents and Disclosures

One of your most important responsibilities is to ensure that your plan documents are updated as required by law and are consistent with the way the plan is actually being administered. Plan documents include, but are not limited to, the plan document, trust document, summary plan description (SPD), and loan documents. While your review of the plan documents should be an ongoing process, you generally need to make sure that any amendments or restatements are executed by the last day of the plan year if you intend for them to be effective for that plan year. You should start by answering the following questions and using your answers as a starting point to a discussion with your ESOP counsel and ESOP advisor:

Summary of Employee Benefits Legislation since ERISA

Chronological Summary of Major Post-ERISA Benefit Legislation provides a summary of the major employee benefits legislation since ERISA:

Tags: 

Chapter 11 Success Stories/Pension and Cash Balance Plans Protected by ERISA and Insured by the PBGC

With all of the recent stories about the Bankruptcy Filings of companies such as the Tribune Company, I am often asked about what will happen to the retirement benefits of the participants. Here are some items to consider:
  • Is the Bankruptcy Filing a Chapter 11 Reorganization or a Chapter 7 Liquidation? When many people think of bankruptcy, they automatically think of a Chapter 7 liquidation. In a Chapter 11 Reorganization, the company will generally continue to exist. Companies that are considered to be Chapter 11 success stories include Texaco, Continental Airlines, Southland Company (7-Eleven), Macy's, and Toys-R-Us.

  • Pension benefits are protected in bankruptcy by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The Department of Labor (DOL) has a guide that provides additional information about how a bankruptcy will affect your benefits: Fact Sheet: Your Employer's Bankruptcy - How Will It Affect Your Employee Benefits?

    Workers in bankruptcy situations face two important issues when it comes to their retirement benefits: access to pension benefits and the continued safety of their pension assets. Generally, your pension assets should not be at risk when a business declares bankruptcy, because ERISA requires that promised pension benefits be adequately funded and that pension monies be kept separate from an employer's business assets and held in trust or invested in an insurance contract. Thus, if an employer declares bankruptcy, the retirement funds should be secure from the company's creditors. In addition, plan fiduciaries must comply with the ERISA provisions that prohibit the mismanagement and abuse of plan assets. If contributions to a plan have been withheld from your pay, you may want to confirm that the amounts deducted have been forwarded to the plan's trust or insurance contract.

  • The Fact Sheet also discusses how insurance for defined benefit plans (including pension and cash balance plans) is provided by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

    In addition, some pension benefits may be insured by the Federal Government. Traditional plans (defined benefit plans) are protected by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), a Federal Government corporation. If a plan is terminated because an employer has financial difficulty and cannot fund the plan, and the plan does not have enough money to pay the promised benefits, the PBGC will assume responsibility for the plan. The PBGC pays benefits after termination up to a certain maximum guaranteed amount. On the other hand, defined contribution plans, such as 401(k) plans, are not insured by the PBGC.

More Year End Checklists

Yesterday I shared a 2008 End of Year Checklist. Here are links to two other checklists. I will share further analysis in subsequent posts, including the next ESOP Planning 2008 installment: ESOP Planning 2008: Plan Documents and Disclosures

2008 End of Year Checklist

2008 End of Year Plan Sponsor "To Do" Lists provides a checklist of items for plan sponsors to address by the end of the year. If you have a different plan year, some of the due dates will be different.

Tax Impact of Tribune Bankruptcy, LLCs and Employee Ownership, and the Latest 409A Proposed Regulations

The December 15, 2008 Employee Ownership Update is online and discusses the following:

Additional Employee Theft Survey Analysis: Trusted Employees Often Commit the Crimes

Earlier today we discussed a survey from the Institute for Corporate Productivity Inc. Businesses Say Theft by Their Workers Is Up provides further analysis, noting that the most trusted employees often commit the crimes and blaming the current economic conditions:

In the wake of the recession, more businesses are facing a growing financial threat: employee theft. New research shows that employers are seeing an increase in internal crimes, ranging from fictitious sales transactions and illegal kickbacks to the theft of office equipment and retail products meant for sale to customers.

Problem: Employee Theft Up in Economic Downturn / Solutions: Communication, Audits, Background Checks, and Employee and Community Engagement

A recent press release announced the results of a survey that found that the current economic downturn has led to an increase in employee theft, especially in large organizations. To address the theft, companies are increasing their communication to employees, conducting additional audits, and putting more emphasis on background checks prior to hiring new employees. Here is the press release:

SEATTLE, WA (Dec. 11, 2008) – The current economic downturn has led to an upturn in workplace theft – especially in large organizations – according to a recent Institute for Corporate Productivity (i4cp) study. The study found that 27% of respondents in large companies - those with 10,000 or more employees - said crime in the workplace has risen during the current economic crisis, while 15% of all respondents, regardless of company size, reported the same.

From an internal perspective, of those companies that feel today's economic situation has led to an increase in theft, almost a quarter (24%) of all respondents, and 31% of companies with 10,000 or more workers, said they've noticed an increase in the theft of company-owned items such as office supplies, products they produce, electronic equipment and food items since the economic downturn.

Undoubtedly the more troubling type of internal theft, however, is employee-related monetary theft (such as the padding of expense reports, the disappearance of cash and other financially related crimes), which was reported as increasing during the downturn by 18% of overall respondents and by 22% of large companies. More subtle "time theft" issues, such as employees using company property for personal use and "Web surfing" of non-company-related Web sites, was cited as being a growing problem by 24% of all companies in the down economy, but just 13% of large organizations consider it a problem.

From an external perspective, in theft issues involving people who don't work at the company, the picture is much the same. A quarter of all respondents and 30% of large companies reported a rise in white-collar crimes committed by outsiders, with areas such as theft of identify or breaches of secure employee data cited. In addition, 28% of all companies and 32% of large organizations reported an increase in physical external criminal activity (such as job-site robberies and break-ins) since the economic decline began.

"As economic pressures mount on employees, it's not surprising that illegal and unethical activities such as workplace theft increase," said Jay Jamrog, i4cp's SVP of research. "What's important for employers to recognize is that this increase is likely, and while much of their attention is probably focused externally on threats to growth in their market, they better also be cognizant that business threats can originate from the inside as well."

To address criminal activities as a result of the state of the economy, 28% of all companies and 38% of large organizations point to increased communication with employees regarding the issue. Twenty percent are conducting additional audits (25% in large companies), and 19% of companies overall are paying more attention to background checks prior to the hiring of new employees.

The
Workplace Theft Pulse survey was conducted by i4cp, in conjunction with HR.com, in November 2008. The total number of respondents was 392. The full results of the survey are available exclusively for all i4cp corporate members.

ESOP Planning 2008: Allocation Timeline

The annual employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) allocation process involves many different parties as well as different moving parts. In order to complete the ESOP allocation in a timely manner, it is important to effectively manage the allocation process. One of the easiest and most effective ways to manage the ESOP allocation process is by preparing and maintaining an allocation timeline.

Bankruptcy Filings: Chapter 11 Reorganization vs. Chapter 7 Liquidation

Whether it be stories about the bankruptcy filings of the Tribune Company and the Antioch Company that we have discussed on this Blog, or the constant media attention on the Big 3 automakers, there appears to be questions about the differences between a Chapter 11 reorganization and a Chapter 7 liquidation:

ERISA Fidelity Bonding

As we continue our ESOP Planning discussion, one area you should review is your ERISA fidelity bonding. Every fiduciary and every person who handles plan funds must be bonded per ERISA Section 412(a), 29 U.S.C. Section 1112(a) - Bonding. The DOL recently published Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2008-04 – EBSA issues guidance on fidelity bonding for employee benefit plans to provide more guidance on the Fidelity Bonding Requirements. The Field Assistance Bulletin (FAB) addresses ERISA Fidelity Bonds, Exemptions From The Bonding Requirements, Funds Or Other Property, Handling Funds Or Other Property, Form And Scope Of Bond, Bond Terms And Provisions, and the Amount Of Bond in 42 Q&As. Here are some notable items:

ESOP Planning 2008

Since we are closing in on the end of the year, I am going to use this as an opportunity to revisit my annual series of ESOP planning articles. A lot of the content will be the same from prior years, but I will also be updating the series for current changes and new resources of information. With that in mind, let's get started:

Reducing or Eliminating Safe Harbor Matching Contributions

During our recent Safe Harbor Notice discussion we explored how the safe harbor match could be stopped during the plan year. Over Before It Began: Eliminating 2009 Safe Harbor Match After Notice is Distributed shares the relevant regulations that discuss the procedure to reduce or eliminate the safe harbor matching contribution and the information required for the supplemental notice:

Tribune Files for Bankruptcy, What Will Happen to the ESOP?

500th Post

I cannot believe it, but this is my 500th post on the One-Stop ESOP Blog (plus 74 more on ERISA Rules and Regulations)! [It may not appear that way on the right sidebar, as I recently moved my historical posts from the ESOP Insourcing site from December 2006 – July 2007, with one post containing all of the historical posts for each particular month.]

The Tribune Company is Preparing for the Possibility of a Bankruptcy Filing

We have spent a lot of time discussing the Tribune Company ESOP buyout and more recently the Tribune Class Action Lawsuit. The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Tribune Company is preparing for a bankruptcy filing as soon as this week:

Employee Engagement in an ESOP Company

Engaging Employees Helps 18th Century Baking Company Become a 'Hot 100' Internet Retailer discusses the employee engagement practices of King Arthur Flour Co., an ESOP company and one of the 2008 Top Small Workplaces. King Arthur uses Employee Surveys to Stay in Touch with the Attitudes and Needs of their employees and the workplace culture:

An ESOP company, King Arthur engages an outside firm to survey their employees on their ownership structure and their workplace culture every two years. Sarah says the results of these surveys help the leadership to stay abreast of employee concerns and meet new challenges, such as communicating with their customers and retaining them as the price of wheat has risen dramatically over the past year.

Employee Communications and Involvement in Tough Economic Times/Declining Valuation Multiples

The Economic Downturn: What Does It Mean for Employee-Owned Companies? discusses issues that employee owned companies will face during the current economic environment. While many companies will face a downturn in sales and profits, companies that utilize open-book management could have an advantage:

If you're an "open book" company, the good news is that you at least have a leg up. The reality is that there are no magic bullets. Fighting through this tough stretch will take determination, resourcefulness, caring, creativity, and more. And employees who know exactly what is going on and where things stand will be in a position to join that fight in a proactive way. At best, employees who are left in the dark will be passive baggage. At worst, uninformed employees will make incorrect assumptions about the condition of the company, perhaps abandoning ship when it isn't really going down, or conversely, going about their work in "business as usual" fashion when it will actually take more than that to see the business through the storm.

Recruiting Best Practices for Small Business

While Recruiting for Small Firms is geared towards accounting firms, it shares some recruiting best practices that would benefit many small businesses:

Declining Valuation Multiples, ESOP Diversification Requirements, and Private Company Industry Averages

The December 1, 2008 Employee Ownership Update is online and discusses the following:

All Posts