one stop esop blog

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

We're Here to Help

describe the image

Aaron Juckett 
President 
CPA, CPC, QPA, QKA 
ESOP Partners LLC 
Phone: 920-659-6000 
Toll Free: 800-837-3112 
Direct: 920-659-6002 
Fax: 866-337-1095 
AJuckett@ESOPPartners.com
ESOPPartners.com 
OneStopESOPBlog.com 

2013 IRS Pension Plan Limits

401(k) Deferral Limit - $17,500

Annual Additions Limit - $51,000

Maximum Compensation Limit - $255,000

Catch-Up Contribution Limit - $5,500

Highly Compensated Employee - $115,000

ESOP 5-Year Distribution Threshold - $1,035,000

ESOP Additional Year Threshold - $205,000

2012 Pension Plan Limits

1989 - 2012 Plan Limits

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

ESOP Advocacy: Another Company Visit Tool Kit

We shared a Congressional Company Visit Kit in August Recess and the Congressional Company Visit. The ESCA District Events Tool Kit is another great resource. The Tool Kit defines a district event and an in-district event:

A district event is when a Member of Congress visits your company. A typical district event will include a "town meeting" type setting where all of the employee owners will gather to hear the Member speak and then have a question and answer discussion. Often this is followed by a facility tour. A district event is a great opportunity for a policymaker from Washington to see firsthand how important employee-owned companies are to their state or district, to hear stories of success in your S ESOP company, and to begin forming a relationship that can be important to the long-term political interest of your company and other S ESOP businesses….

Section 415 Amendment Deadline

In our ESOP Planning 2008: Plan Documents and Disclosures installment we provided some links to some Year End Checklists. One of the themes in all of the checklists was to make sure the Code Section 415 Amendments are adopted by the appropriate deadline:

Qualified plans (including both defined contribution and defined benefit pension plans) must be amended to comply with the final regulations under Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, (415 amendments). The final regulations are effective for limitation years beginning on or after July 1, 2007 (e.g., January 1, 2008 for plans with a calendar year limitation year). The regulations include two types of changes.

6 Ways to Improve Your Culture

Six Tips to be a Better Boss and Improve Your Culture shares six ways to becoming improve your culture and some related to dos:

5 Tips in Communicating the Ups and Downs of Stock Value

Explaining the Ups and Downs of Stock Value discusses five tips in communicating stock value:

How Public Company PE Ratios Impact an ESOP Valuation

Privately held ESOPs and public-company PE ratios discusses the impact that the price-earnings (PE) ratios of comparable public companies has on the valuation of a privately held ESOP company. It notes that PE ratios likely have further to fall and discusses what this means for ESOP companies:

America Saves Week 2009

More Analysis on the Latest General Mills/ESOP Redemptive Dividend Ruling

Corporation not entitled to 404(k) deduction for redemption of stock used to satisfy ESOP distribution obligations discusses General Mills, Inc. v. United States, No. 08-1638 (8th Cir., January 26, 2009), which found that a corporation was not entitled to an IRC Section 404(k) deduction for the proceeds from a stock redemption that were used to fund cash distributions:

2009 Charles R. Edmunson Scholarship

57% of 100 Best Companies have Broad-Based Ownership

The February 17, 2009 Employee Ownership Update is online and discusses the following:

Eliminating or Changing a Fixed Matching Formula

Last week we discussed ways to freeze or eliminate a safe harbor match. Eliminating or Reducing a Plan's Matching Formula discusses the issues related to eliminating or reducing a fixed matching contribution formula by providing 3 FAQs:

  1. May an employer eliminate or reduce a fixed matching contribution formula in a traditional 401(k) plan mid-year? If so, will the employer need to fund the match through the date of the amendment?
  2. If an employer eliminates a match (fixed or discretionary) in a traditional 401(k) plan must it provide a notice to the participants?
  3. If an employer with a discretionary match provides a communication (e.g., notice) informing the participants of the match it will make the for the plan year, may the employer ignore the communication and not provide the match?

Corporate Governance: Duties of Care, Loyalty, and Obedience

When we last left our discussion, we had discussed Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and More Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and shared some Board Member Job Descriptions. The Three Duties discusses the three legal duties that are the legal requirements and ethical guidelines of a Director:

Rules and Regulations 2009 – Week 6

Here are links to recently published rules and regulations:

Rules and Regulations 2009 – Week 5

Here are links to recently published rules and regulations:

Potential Side Effect of Layoffs: Partial Plan Termination

ESOP Technical Alert provides a reminder of a potential side effect of layoffs – a partial plan termination:

IRS Position on Rebalancing and/or Segregation Plan Provisions

The IRS has been informally stating that they are holding approval of plan documents containing Provisions for Account Segregation and/or Rebalancing. Corey Rosen explores the issue further in ESOP Account Segregation and Rebalancing Sense and Nonsense. He discusses the issue and notes that he and many ESOP experts feel the provisions are legal:

The IRS apparently is not so sure. In informal (and I stress, only informal) conversations, they have indicated they won't be accepting letters of determination with these provisions. They won't be saying you can't do it either. It's just that their sensibilities are apparently offended here that a company might do something that is actually prudent and in line with the spirit of the law, but, under one interpretation anyway, not exactly what they see as the letter of the law saying.

Mid-Year Safe Harbor Changes: Freezing or Eliminating the Match and Using the Maybe Nonelective Notice

We recently discussed Reducing or Eliminating Safe Harbor Matching Contributions during the plan year. Mid-year Safe Harbor 401(k) Plan Changes contains 10 FAQs on how an employer can eliminate or freeze safe harbor matching contributions mid-year and how to use the "maybe" notice approach to have more flexibility with nonelective safe harbor contributions:

  1. May an employer freeze a safe harbor 401(k) plan mid-year or, in the alternative, amend it into a traditional 401(k) plan mid-year?
  2. What are the necessary steps to freeze or amend mid-year a safe harbor 401(k) plan which provides the safe harbor matching contribution?
  3. May a safe harbor 401(k) plan with a safe harbor matching contribution formula and an additional matching contribution formula (discretionary or fixed) that is intended to qualify under the ACP safe harbor (ACP safe harbor match) eliminate or amend the ACP safe harbor match? May a safe harbor 401(k) plan eliminate or amend the ACP safe harbor match and not the safe harbor matching contribution formula that enables the plan to satisfy the ADP test safe harbor?
  4. For an employer that wishes to retain flexibility over the safe harbor nonelective contribution, what plan design options are available?
  5. What steps must the employer follow to apply the "maybe" notice approach?
  6. May an employer apply the "maybe" notice for more than one plan year?
  7. May an employer terminate a safe harbor 401(k) plan mid-year?
  8. What steps must the employer follow to terminate a safe harbor 401(k) plan?
  9. May an employer terminate a safe harbor 401(k) plan and retain safe harbor status for the short plan year?
  10. What factors must an employer use to determine if it has incurred a substantial business hardship?

Potential Universe of ESOP Companies and ESOP Survey Results: 2009 Expectations and Access to Credit

The February 2, 2009 Employee Ownership Update is online and discusses the following:

  • ESOP Companies Weathering Tough Times
  • Google's Generous Option Exchange Program
  • ESOPs and the Coming Wave of Business Sales
  • NCEO Member Survey Preliminary Results

ESOP Survey Results

The Benefits of Sabbaticals

In Employee Retention Ideas, we discussed effective program one firm uses to ensure their key employees are taking a vacation. The Virtues and Challenges of a Long Break explores how many firms find sabbaticals to be worthy investments. This Journal of Accountancy article includes comments from HLB Tautges Redpath, Ltd, a 100% ESOP-Owned Accounting Firm. Here is the executive summary:

  • Sabbatical programs are relatively rare in accounting, but firms that incorporate them as part of their benefits package may find that they act as a powerful recruitment and retention tool, help develop talent, serve as a visible statement of corporate values, and engender client approval—all in addition to re-energizing those who take the extended time off.

  • Sabbaticals are appropriate for any size firm Small firms as well as large firms can benefit with proper planning.

  • The cost of a sabbatical program depends, in part, on the level and function of the person going on extended leave. Commonly costs are calculated in terms of the salary paid and the revenues lost.

5 Kinds of Individual Equity Compensation Plans and their Impact on 409(p) and 409A

Employee Ownership Teaching Module

We recently discussed New Approaches to Spread Employee Ownership. One of the new approaches was a new Employee Ownership Teaching Module. Employee Ownership: A Topic for the Entrepreneurship Curriculum shows "four areas in the entrepreneurship curriculum where teaching about employee ownership can 1) put a needed spotlight on this widespread and useful practice and 2) add conceptual value and rich examples for the course topics being taught," and discusses how employee ownership is underappreciated:

"Between one-third and one-half of employees participate directly in company performance through profit sharing, gain sharing, employee ownership, or stock options" (Rhokeun Park, Douglas Kruse, and Joseph Blasi, Shared capitalism: Prevalence, characteristics, and employee views of financial participation in enterprises, 2008). Employee ownership is an under-appreciated means for funding new ventures and securing employee alignment with the enterprise. EO is found in start-ups and "built to last" corporations. It harnesses employee motivation at every stage of organizational growth.

IRS Forms 1099-R/Cycle C Submission Deadline

As most of you that are responsible for Benefit Payment Government Filings are aware, tomorrow is the deadline to distribute IRS Forms 1099-R. Many attorneys are also well aware of the submission deadline for Cycle C employers. Feature: 2009 ERISA Compliance Calendar for DB/DC/403(b) Plans contains a calendar of key events in 2009, including the following January/February dates:

JAN 31 / Many recordkeepers require participant data for average deferral percentage (ADP)/average contribution percentage (ACP), Top Heavy, and 402(g) compliance testing to be returned by this date.

All Posts