one stop esop blog

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

We're Here to Help

describe the image

Aaron Juckett 
President 
CPA, CPC, QPA, QKA 
ESOP Partners LLC 
Phone: 920-659-6000 
Toll Free: 800-837-3112 
Direct: 920-659-6002 
Fax: 866-337-1095 
AJuckett@ESOPPartners.com
ESOPPartners.com 
OneStopESOPBlog.com 

2013 IRS Pension Plan Limits

401(k) Deferral Limit - $17,500

Annual Additions Limit - $51,000

Maximum Compensation Limit - $255,000

Catch-Up Contribution Limit - $5,500

Highly Compensated Employee - $115,000

ESOP 5-Year Distribution Threshold - $1,035,000

ESOP Additional Year Threshold - $205,000

2012 Pension Plan Limits

1989 - 2012 Plan Limits

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Craig v. Smith, 2009 WL 438635 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 20, 2009)

The U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, recently ruled in Craig v. Smith, 2009 WL 438635 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 20, 2009) that a company and its ESOP are jointly and severally liable for a breach of fiduciary duties by violating the terms of the plan document and IRC Section 409(h)(5) - Right to demand employer securities; put option - Payment requirement for total distribution by issuing a 10-year promissory note rather than the statutory limit of 5 years:

Elimination of 2010 AGI Income Limitation to Convert an IRA to a Roth IRA

The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) provided for Rollovers to Roth IRAs beginning January 1, 2008. Making a Good Deal for Retirement Even Better discusses how the AGI income limitation for most individuals will be eliminated in 2010 and how to prepare for any IRA conversions.

Studies: 29% of Companies Have or Intend to Modify Match, Making 401(k) and Financial Education and Advice Available is Top Priority.

Over the last few months we have discussed how to reduce or eliminate a Traditional Match, a Mid-Year Safe Harbor Match, and a Mid-Year Safe Harbor Nonelective Contribution, and we have discussed Communicating 401(k) Benefit Cuts. We have also discussed Conflicting Surveys on whether employers are reducing or eliminating matching contributions.

401(k) plan benefits: Rethinking plan design for challenging times reports the results of a Grant Thornton LLP survey that explored the impact of the current economic downturn on the employer match feature:

Issuing and Cancelling Stock Certificates for Stock Distributions

Last October we discussed technical advice memorandum (TAM) 200841042, which confirmed that ESOP Stock Distributions Subject to Immediate Put Option to Company are Stock Distributions eligible for net unrealized appreciation (NUA) treatment. One of the biggest takeaways from this TAM is the documentation of a distribution process accepted by the IRS. While the documented distribution process has been helpful, questions have come up about the process of issuing and cancelling stock certificates. The distribution process discussed in the TAM involved cancelling the Plan's stock certificate, issuing new certificates to the Plan and to the participant, and then cancelling the participant's stock certificate upon redemption of the shares by the company. The TAM also cited IRS Revenue Ruling 81-158, 1981-1 C.B. 205 - Taxability of beneficiary under a trust which meets the requirements of section 401(a), which provides that a profit sharing distribution occurs upon the delivery of stock certificates to a transfer agent with instructions to reissue them in the name of the distributee.

New Finance Rules May Hurt 401(k) Plan Sponsors

Earlier this week a Historic Overhaul of Finance Rules was announced:

SMLR’s Annual Fellowship Program

The June 12, 2009 Employee Ownership Update is online and discusses the following:

Employee Engagement and Employee Ownership

He's Just Not That Into You: What Employees Really Think of Their Employers discusses how a recent survey found that less than one third of employees are engaged in their work. It compares the employee engagement issue to parenting young children:

It will be interesting to see how this change affe...

It will be interesting to see how this change affects the pressure plan sponsors exert on TPA's and other record holders to get appropriate paperwork to the audit firm in enough time so audit procedures can beging. I don't think anyone wants to be put in the situation where they have the Form 5500 completed but can not produce an audit opinion.

Interesting post and there appears to be a lot of meaningful changes coming.

ESOP-Owned Bank Thrives

Last November we discussed how Thriving ESOP-Owned Banks like the Paducah Bank & Trust Company Keep Employee Turnover Low.



2009 Scholarship Award Winners

Cost to Establish and Maintain an ESOP

Twelve Bogus Reasons Not to Do an ESOP (and Seven Good Ones) contains a list of twelve fallacies that are are commonly cited as reaons to not implement an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP):

  1. ESOPs have excessively high legal and administrative costs, especially for small firms
  2. The ESOP cannot match what other buyers will offer
  3. The employees don't have the funds to buy the company
  4. Employees must invest in other retirement plans to diversify their investment
  5. Companies have to make a fixed contribution every year
  6. Bank credit for an ESOP loan is not available
  7. Companies have to keep repurchasing their own shares
  8. Management must share financial information with employees
  9. Younger employees are more concerned with short-term cash than with potential retirement benefits
  10. ESOPs are difficult for employees to understand and appreciate
  11. ESOPs do not improve corporate performance
  12. You can only do an ESOP in a public company

COST TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN AN ESOP

Employee Ownership Roundtable and Shared Capitalism Fellowship Program

Last week we discussed the Current State of Employee Ownership in the academic world. Employee Ownership Foundation and University of Pennsylvania's Center for Organizational Dynamics Hold 2nd Annual Symposium on Employee Ownership discusses the 2nd Annual Roundtable Conversation among Scholars and ESOP Leaders:

The 2009 symposium was broken up into two sessions: morning – how fit and resilient are ESOP companies in the current economic crisis?; afternoon – given their stability and long-term perspectives, are ESOP companies hotbeds for green management and making the business case for sustainable development?...

Loan Covenant Best Practices

Loan Covenants Tighten Up shares some best practices to consider when talking to a lender:

More Analysis of the Proposed Regulations to Suspend Safe Harbor Nonelective Contributions

In mid-May we discussed how proposed Treasury Regulation [REG–115699–09] – Suspension or Reduction of Safe Harbor Nonelective Contributions provides for the Suspension or Reduction of Safe Harbor Nonelective Contributions Mid-Year for both a traditional safe harbor plan and a qualified automatic contribution arrangement (QACA). The proposed regulations provide similar guidance to eliminating the safe harbor nonelective contributions that already exist for Mid-Year Safe Harbor Matching Contribution Changes. Unlike reducing or eliminating the match, the nonelective contribution may only be eliminated if there is a substantial business hardship. Needed Relief for Suspension of Safe Harbor Nonelective Contributions Arrives—With a Catch raises concerns with the fourth substantial business hardship requirement that "it is reasonable to expect that the plan will be continued only if the waiver is granted":

Considering Subsequent Events in the ESOP Appraisal

We have recently discussed valuation issues created by the current economic environment, including Declining Valuation Multiples, How Public Company PE Ratios Impact an ESOP Valuation, and Employee Communications and Involvement in Tough Economic Times. Economic Crisis Raises Questions About Business Valuation Standards discusses some of the new questions and issues that valuation professionals and ESOP fiduciaries face in today's environment:

The current global economic crisis, in combination with the body of accepted professional standards and case law on business valuation, has led to uncertainty over the current application of business valuation standards. In particular, uncertainty exists concerning what kinds of company-specific events directly resulting from the crisis can be addressed in a valuation report. Specifically, it is unclear when events that have occurred after a particular valuation date, but before the preparation of the valuation report for that period, should be included in such a report. Now more than ever, business valuation professionals and those seeking the services of such professionals, such as ESOP fiduciaries, need clarification.

All Posts